Knee-jerk reactions over the unknown.
Like a child adamantly refusing to enter his own room until the light is switched on, it's a self-preservation mechanism.
Behind it is a bit of the old adage, "better safe than sorry". And it's understandable.
Nobody wants to put themselves in potential danger.
And yet, there are consequences to every reaction.
It will be prudent to consider them.
Playing With Fire is Just Like Playing With Anything Else. Or Is It?
"Don't play with fire."
And yet, there are professional “players” of fire - Cooks, Welders, Metalsmiths.
Why is it ok for them but not for us?
Managed risk. And experience. You can be sure, though, that they've all been burned more than a couple of times in their professions.
In my years as an educator, presiding over activities involving fire (e.g. we use a flame to do microbiology work that requires a sterile environment), I've only witnessed 2 incidents.
Both were minor and both occurred because strict instructions were willfully ignored.
Nobody was hurt, but a container had to be replaced, and somebody's fringe had a corner go missing. She laughed about it, and her friends were more concerned than she was, but she was fine.
More and more, I meet teachers who refuse to allow their students to handle fire or sharp objects.
Which is perplexing, because these same students have classes in the kitchen that require them to do those things.
It irks me when well-meaning adults treat teenagers like young children, mollycoddling and wrapping them around bubbles of protection. It's health and safety gone mad!
Please. They are perfectly capable of taking care of themselves, as long as we give them guidelines and show them that we trust them to follow these guidelines.
Furthermore, those of us who come up with programmes for them know what we are doing.
All these fears are doing is depriving students of quality experiences, education, and life lessons.
Which, to me, is a great tragedy.
Systems are Designed. Their Flaws Can Also be Designed Away.
It's easy to understand why people in large systems do the things they do.
Because the systems are composed of so many working parts, a tiny error somewhere can eventually lead to a cascade of catastrophe.
Or at least that's what the fear is.
As a result, most of the people working within these systems are terrified that they are going to get punished for causing a malfunction, so they opt for a "better safe than sorry", "have all my bases covered" approach to everything.
This results in blanket policies, reactive strategies, and a general unwillingness to rock the boat, making changes only if absolutely necessary and only after mind-numbingly long periods of time.
Bureaucracy, red tape, infuriatingly inflexible gatekeepers, we've all met them.
And hate them.
And yet, they aren't there by accident. They are there by design.
Which means that they can also be designed away.
Hence the immense importance of thought leadership, safe spaces, and granting autonomy.